NOKIA Lumia 800 vs. SAMSUNG Omnia W

7,3 Winner SAMSUNGOmnia W 3 125 kr Electroworld Reasons to buy the Samsung Omnia W Vivid screen Super AMOLED Light-weight 115 g Average latency 139 ms Long standby time 20,4 days Really small 58x116x10 mm Thin 11 mm Long talk time 14 hours Average battery capacity 1 500 mAh Slower upload speed 0,47 mbps Average download speed 1,49 mbps 7,0 Runner-up NOKIALumia 800 4 628 kr Proshop Reasons to buy the Nokia Lumia 800 High resolution 8 MP Average amount of internal storage 16 GB

storage 10,0 vs 1,0 Winner: Nokia Lumia 800 [details] More than 2x more internal storage, which means more music, photos and movies, 16 GB vs 7,8 GB sensors 5,5 vs 10,0 Winner: Samsung Omnia W [details] battery 6,3 vs 10,0 Winner: Samsung Omnia W [details] More than 80% more standby time, less frequent charging, 20,4 days vs 11 days Around 10% more talk time per battery charge, 14 hours vs 13 hours Almost the same, 1 500 mAh vs 1 450 mAh size 6,0 vs 8,2 Winner: Samsung Omnia W [details] Around 20% lighter, 115 g vs 142 g More than 10% smaller, 58x116x10 mm vs 61x116x12 mm Around 10% thinner, 11 mm vs 12 mm screen 7,2 vs 8,8 Winner: Samsung Omnia W [details] The Omnia W has a Super AMOLED screen which is generally brighter and more vivid, Super AMOLED vs AMOLED network 6,4 vs 6,9 Winner: Samsung Omnia W [details] 2.5x less network latency, 139 ms vs 352 ms Around 30% faster actual upload speeds, 0,47 mbps vs 0,37 mbps More than 20% faster actual download speeds, 1,49 mbps vs 1,22 mbps photo & video 10,0 vs 10,0 Too close to call [details] web browsing 9,1 vs 9,1 Too close to call [details] Both have fast web browsers processing power 8,3 vs 8,3 Too close to call [details] Powerful processors, very snappy and responsive music 1,0 vs 1,0 Too close to call [details] keyboard & keypad - vs 1,0 Missing information [details] overall 7,0 vs 7,3

Storage

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	memory card	None	vs	None	Neither has a memory card slot
	internal storage	16 GB	vs	7,8 GB	The Lumia 800's has an average amount of internal storage for storing music, photos and movies, but the Omnia W is below average

Sensors

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	gps	Assisted GPS	vs	Assisted GPS	Have assisted GPS
	accelerometer	Yes	vs	Yes	Both include an accelerometer
	compass	Yes	vs	Yes	Both have integrated compasses
	gyroscope	No	vs	Yes

Battery

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	talk time	13 hours	vs	14 hours	Very long talk time
	standby time	11 days	vs	20,4 days	The Omnia W has good standby time, but the Lumia 800 is average
	battery capacity	1 450 mAh	vs	1 500 mAh	Average capacity batteries
	technology	Unknown	vs	Lithium Ion

Size

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	weight	142 g	vs	115 g	The Omnia W is quite light, but the Lumia 800 is heavier
	thickness	12 mm	vs	11 mm	The Omnia W is thin, while the Lumia 800 is just average thickness
	size	61x116x12 mm	vs	58x116x10 mm	The Omnia W is fairly small, but the Lumia 800 is not far behind
	waterproof	No	vs	No	Neither are waterproof

Screen

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	screen size	3,7"	vs	3,7"	Average sized screens
	screen resolution	800x480	vs	800x480	Average screen resolution
	screen ppi	252 PPI	vs	252 PPI	Average display of text, images and video
	screen type	AMOLED	vs	Super AMOLED	The Omnia W as a Super AMOLED screen which is even more vivid, the Lumia 800 doesn't
	touchscreen type	Capacitive	vs	Capacitive	Touchscreen

Network

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	network	HSDPA (14,4 mbps)	vs	HSDPA (14,4 mbps)	Average data speeds
	generation	3.5G	vs	3.5G	Standard network technology
	download speed	1,22 mbps	vs	1,49 mbps	Average actual download speeds
	upload speed	0,37 mbps	vs	0,47 mbps	Somewhat slow actual upload speeds
	network latency	352 ms	vs	139 ms	The Omnia W has average network latency, but the Lumia 800's is worse than most
	wifi	802.11n (150 mbps)	vs	802.11n (150 mbps)	Average wifi speed
	wifi hotspot	No	vs	No	Neither have wifi hotspots for wireless tethering
	nfc	No	vs	No	Neither support NFC for wireless transactions
	bluetooth	2,1	vs	2,1	Average bluetooth support

Photo & Video

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	camera	8 MP	vs	5 MP	They both have cameras
	flash	Yes	vs	Yes	Both have camera flashes
	secondary camera	Unknown	vs	0,3 MP
	movie format	720p @ 30fps	vs	720p @ 30fps	Both shoot high resolution HD movies
	video out	None	vs	None	Neither have video output to connect to TVs etc

Web browsing

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	browser benchmark	1 575 ms	vs	1 614 ms	Both have fast web browsers
	adobe flash support	No	vs	No	Neither supports Adobe Flash

Processing power

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	frequency	1,4 GHz	vs	1,4 GHz	Powerful processors, very snappy and responsive
	number of cores	Single core	vs	Single core	Both have single core cpus which is about the average
	ram	512 MB	vs	512 MB	Average amount of RAM for running apps

Music

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	fm radio	Yes	vs	Yes	Both have built in FM radios to listen to news and music from FM stations
	fm transmitter	No	vs	No	Neither have built-in FM transmitters
	headphone jack	3.5 mm	vs	3.5 mm	Both have a headphone jack

Keyboard & keypad

	NOKIA LUMIA 800			SAMSUNG OMNIA W
	numeric keypad	Unknown	vs	None
	keyboard	Unknown	vs	None